There are different game styles rather than right or wrong. Doing up to GE4 every week again does not guarantee winning diamonds or you end up spending almost all you win to get round, not everyone enjoys battles. Wells and FOY have reduced % chance of diamonds. Obtaining diamonds to cover this cost without a purchase is another matter and also down to luck. Ronnie is correct you need diamonds if you are unsuccessful within the allotted negotiation attempts.
In events you have to complete the required negotiations to progress although there is usually an alternative quest option like battles. In GE you can lose an attempt and start again or skip a daily. Having all the goods in the world will not allow you to escape the 10 diamond 'fee' for extra goes until you guess right. You have to use diamonds in negotiations if you do not guess correctly in 4 tries (using tavern boost for GE) or in 4 allocated tries (or 3) in daily challenges, Japan or event quests. (little example Egypt 1 built every military building then quickly only used 2 archers and finally didnt even keep the pyramid up and still beat the timer) FOE keeps the brain active Master build and delete and get the buzz of beating the game. As said patience, dont rush to age up beyond Iron Age when most features are obtained, build up reserves then in GE you may start winning diamonds.īeing a pensioner means you have years of experience to master some of the strategy in the game including cultural settlements. Diamonds really come into their own during events when sometimes a small spend can get you out of trouble and gain a final building level however even doing events is tough for newer players. Naturally as a business Inno don't really want people to play for free nor make it easy to do so as that is a bad business model. Click to expand.Have you therefore been playing over 7 years? Established players can build up huge diamond reserves sadly newer players don't always realise how long the game has been going and don't realise there is no instant gratification.
0 kommentar(er)
